Coming from the PLM perspective, I won't spend much time on defining PLM – I will just go with the CIMdata definition of PLM as:
•A strategic business approach that applies a consistent set of business solutions that support the collaborative creation, management, dissemination, and use of product definition information
•Supporting the extended enterprise (customers, design and supply partners, etc.)
•Spanning from concept to end of life of a product or plant
•Integrating people, processes, business systems, and information
The issues in defining the dynamic topic of social computing or Web 2.0 are well described in
(Amazon affiliate link)
As a starting point, the book cites the famous „What is Web 2.0“ article by Tim O'Reilly and the table comparing old Web with Web 2.0:
Web 1.0 | Web 2.0 | |
DoubleClick | --> | Google AdSense |
Ofoto | --> | Flickr |
Akamai | --> | BitTorrent |
mp3.com | --> | Napster |
Britannica Online | --> | Wikipedia |
personal websites | --> | blogging |
evite | --> | upcoming.org and EVDB |
domain name speculation | --> | search engine optimization |
page views | --> | cost per click |
screen scraping | --> | web services |
publishing | --> | participation |
content management systems | --> | wikis |
directories (taxonomy) | --> | tagging ("folksonomy") |
stickiness | --> | syndication |
More basic, let's consider the following technologies Web 2.0:
- Blogs, wikis and other community spaces for collaboration
- Real-time communication and sharing including status updates and presence detection
- Profile pages of experts – making their specific skills searchable
- Social search mechanisms including rating and tagging
The book goes beyond such a list of basic technologies and extracts some patterns that characterize successful Web 2.0 companies:
- Participation – Collaboration among self-organizing communities
- Mashup for content aggregation
- Collaborative tagging or folksonomy
- Rich user experience or rich internet application (RIA)
- ...
With this, lets define Social Product Development as the use of Web 2.0 technologies and patterns for PLM.
This picture is catchy, but I think it also is misleading: the intersection is just too small. I would consider social computing more as an infrastructure upgrade for PLM – especially for the collaborative pieces of PLM.
In the next posts, I would like to focus on
- real world examples of companies using social product development
- best practices for the implementation of social product development
Please share your descriptions and links in the comments section of this post.